On the forecourt the choice looks simple: standard unleaded, super unleaded, or E85 on the rare pump that has it. In the workshop the question looks different, because what matters isn't the octane rating but the ethanol content and what it does to the materials in the fuel system.
Here's the sorting, machine by machine.
What's actually in each fuel
- Standard unleaded (95 octane): sold as E10, so up to 10 % ethanol. It's the default grade on almost every forecourt.
- Super unleaded (97/98 octane): sold as E5, up to 5 % ethanol. Compared with standard, you're buying two things at once — a higher octane rating and less ethanol.
- E85 (superethanol): 65 to 85 % ethanol depending on the season.
The two properties of ethanol that matter on a bike:
- It's hygroscopic: it draws moisture out of the air. Past a certain threshold the water separates out of the blend and settles at the bottom of the float bowl or the tank — that's phase separation. The engine then draws in ethanol-laden water, which corrodes.
- It's a solvent: it attacks certain elastomers and certain alloys — older rubber fuel lines, carburettor seals, floats, some internal tank coatings, and aluminium and zamak over long periods.
The octane rating: the wrong argument
The octane rating measures resistance to pre-ignition, not the quality or the energy content of the fuel. An engine designed for 95 gains nothing at all from 98. No extra power, no better economy, no mechanical benefit.
Three cases where super unleaded is justified:
- The manufacturer requires it (minimum rating shown on the filler flap or in the manual): high compression ratios, sportsbikes, tuned engines.
- The machine pinks on standard under load — a sign you need to check the ignition, the fuelling and the state of the combustion chamber anyway.
- Long-term storage: super is supplied as E5, so it carries less ethanol than E10, and that is the point that justifies the extra cost.
Which bike on which fuel
| Machine | E10 (standard) | E5 (super) | E85 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fuel-injected bike, 2000s onwards | Yes, unless stated otherwise | Yes | No, not without conversion |
| 1990s carburettor bike | Generally yes, keep an eye on the seals | Preferable | No |
| Pre-1990 carburettor bike | Best avoided | Yes | No |
| Classic bike, original tank | No | Yes, with a stabiliser | No |
| Recent 4-stroke scooter | Yes | Yes | No |
| 2-stroke engine (bike, garden kit) | Not advised | Yes | No |
The E10 compatibility lists published by the authorities and the manufacturers remain the reference. If in doubt, the model's manual gives the maximum permissible ethanol content.
Older machines: the real subject
On a bike built before the 1990s, three parts are exposed:
- Rubber fuel lines that aren't ethanol-compatible harden, crack and eventually swell from the inside, shedding particles that block the jets. Replacing them with hose marked as ethanol-compatible (rated for oxygenated fuels) costs a few pounds and settles the matter.
- Carburettor seals, diaphragms and floats. An accelerator-pump diaphragm under attack hardens and stops metering. Modern rebuild kits use compatible materials.
- The tank. An old internal coating can lift off in sheets. On a bare steel tank, the water ethanol pulls in accelerates corrosion — that's the source of the rust that shows up after a winter laid up.
For those machines the practical rule: run on E5 — super unleaded, store it with a stabiliser, and swap hoses and seals for ethanol-compatible parts at the first rebuild.




